Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.25 seconds)Sunderbha1 Ambalal Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2002
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated at Bar
that no confiscation proceedings are pending qua the vehicle in
question and the same is case property. The learned counsel for
the petitioner has relied upon Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs.
State of Gujarat, (2002) 10 SCC 283, to contend that the
Supreme court has held that the vehicle should not be permitted
to remain parked in the police station as same shall gather rust
and shall not remain useful.
Lekhraj Bansal vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 25 February, 2014
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon
the judgment of this Court in S.B. Crl. Misc. Petition No.2958/2018
(Lekhraj vs. State of Rajasthan) decided on 20.11.2018, wherein
this Court passed the following order :-
Sri. Lakshman Rao vs Sri. Satish P on 9 August, 2018
The Single Bench judgment in Lakshman vs. State of
Rajasthan Through P.P. has held as under: -
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Laxman Lal(Dead)Through Lrs. & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 1 March, 2013
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that in bunch of petitions, lead case being D.B. Cr. Misc. Petition
No. 60/2018, titled as Laxman vs. State of Rajasthan, a
Division Bench of this Court on 6.4.2018, has held that if a vehicle
has been seized under the Provisions of Mines and Minerals
(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short 'MMDR Act'), for
72 hours competent Officer can retain the vehicle and thereafter,
he is mandatorily required to report the matter to his superior
officer as also to the Magistrate having jurisdiction. The Division
Bench has held as under:-