Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.60 seconds)
Dr. Sabeela Banu Chenben vs Union Of India And Others on 27 April, 2026 cites

Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs State Of Bihar on 17 December, 2019

19. It is further argued that the incorrect assessment of vacancies as on June 11, 1997 by the Andaman and Nicobar Administration constitutes a distinct and continuing illegality, vitiating the entire process. It is argued that the challenge to the same is not barred by limitation, since the communication between the UPSC and A & N Administration was not supposed to be in the knowledge of the petitioner and the right to challenge the same accrued only upon coming to know of such vacancy position when it was disclosed to the petitioner. Mere participation in a process, it is argued, does not operate as estoppel against challenging the foundational illegality, for which proposition the petitioner cites Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs. State of Bihar and Others (Civil Appeal No. 9482 of 2019).
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 78 - S Kant - Full Document
1