Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (2.34 seconds)
Shiv Shankar Jha vs The State Of Jharkhand on 10 February, 2021 cites

Nar Singh Pal vs Union Of India & Ors on 28 March, 2000

(iv) Learned counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon the following decisions and submitted that the benefit which is given of higher pay scale of Intermediate Trained Scale cannot be withdrawn after such a long lapse of time:- (i) in a case of Papsu Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lachhman Das Gupta & others as reported in 2001(2)JCR 467 (SC), (ii) in a case of Teres Ekka Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. as reported in 2007(2)JLJR 41, and (iii) Nar Singh Pal Vs. Union of India & others as reported in 5 2000(3) SCC 588. In view of these decisions also, the order passed at Annexure-7, deserves to be quashed and set aside."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 113 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Pepsu Road Transport Corp. vs Lachhman Singh on 14 May, 2015

(iv) Learned counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon the following decisions and submitted that the benefit which is given of higher pay scale of Intermediate Trained Scale cannot be withdrawn after such a long lapse of time:- (i) in a case of Papsu Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lachhman Das Gupta & others as reported in 2001(2)JCR 467 (SC), (ii) in a case of Teres Ekka Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. as reported in 2007(2)JLJR 41, and (iii) Nar Singh Pal Vs. Union of India & others as reported in 5 2000(3) SCC 588. In view of these decisions also, the order passed at Annexure-7, deserves to be quashed and set aside."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Terres Ekka vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 14 July, 2006

(iv) Learned counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon the following decisions and submitted that the benefit which is given of higher pay scale of Intermediate Trained Scale cannot be withdrawn after such a long lapse of time:- (i) in a case of Papsu Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lachhman Das Gupta & others as reported in 2001(2)JCR 467 (SC), (ii) in a case of Teres Ekka Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. as reported in 2007(2)JLJR 41, and (iii) Nar Singh Pal Vs. Union of India & others as reported in 5 2000(3) SCC 588. In view of these decisions also, the order passed at Annexure-7, deserves to be quashed and set aside."
Jharkhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - P Kohli - Full Document
1