Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)Gurmukh Singh And Ors. vs The State Of Punjab on 14 December, 1971
As far as genuineness of sale deeds (Ex. PW4/1 to Ex. PW4/3) is
concerned, the same is not disputed by the State. It is also evident on record that
the land owners therein had paid more value as compared to the value determined
by this Court for acquisition of the land. They cannot be put to loss as payment of
less value than what they had spent on the purchase of the property would amount
to depriving them from their property without adequate compensation.
Accordingly, I deem it appropriate to grant them compensation to the tune of
amount spent by them granting increase @ 10% per annum thereon. Accordingly,
the compensation payable to the land owners of land forming part of sale deeds
R.F.A. No. 1841 of 2000 [6]
(Ex. PW4/1 and Ex. PW4/2) shall be Rs. 5,625/- per marla, whereas for the land
owner in sale deed (Ex. PW4/3), the same shall be Rs. 8,480/- per marla. Similar
view was expressed by this Court in Gurmukh Singh v. Punjab State, 1987 Recent
Revenue Reports 143 and R.F.A. No. 122 of 2000--Smt. Neelam v. State of
Haryana and others, decided on 22.9.2008.
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
1