Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)Madura Mills Company Ltd. vs Guruvammal And Anr. on 2 September, 1966
4. The second point urged by the Learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the finding of the appellate authority that the provisions of Section 10(3)(a)(iii), are not applicable is not correct. The appellate authority differing from the Rent Controller held that the landlord has taken possession of shop B from his vendor after the sale deed. First of all, though this is a finding on a question of fact, I am unable to agree with the same as there is absolutely no evidence. As held by this Court in Madurai Mills Ltd. v. Guruvammal , a revisional authority can interfere with a finding of fact also if there is no other material on which such a finding could be based or, the finding has been reached by a consideration of irrelevant or inadmissible matter, or it is so perverse that no reasonable person could have reached that conclusion or the finding had been reached by an erroneous understanding of the law applicable to the particular matter.
1