Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)
Mumtaz Yunus Mulani vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 March, 2008 cites

Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994

(h) Size of the family and liabilities, if any, etc. It is most respectfully submitted that the Board of Directors of the petitioner Bank had approved the abovesaid Scheme, which was based upon the guidelines circulated by Indian Banks' Association to all the public sector banks which in turn are based upon the law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in the case of Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana. The Scheme after approval was circulated vide PDCL 6/97 read with PDCL 11/99 dated 17-4-1999."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 2647 - P B Sawant - Full Document

I.G. (Karmik) & Ors vs Prahalad Mani Tripathi on 27 April, 2007

10. However, it is now a well settled principle of law that appointment on compassionate ground is not a source of recruitment. The reason for making such a benevolent scheme by the State or the Public Sector Undertaking is to see that the dependents of the deceased are not deprived of the means of livelihood. It only enables the family of the deceased to get over the sudden financial crisis. {see I.G. (Karmik) & Ors. v. Prahalad Mani Tripathi [(2007) 6 SCC 162]}.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 293 - S B Sinha - Full Document

National Institute Of Technology & Ors vs Niraj Kumar Singh on 2 February, 2007

8. Appointment on compassionate ground can only be granted to tide over the sudden crisis of the family of the deceased. The right to get appointment on compassionate ground would depend upon the scheme operating in the field. [See Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana & Ors. [(1994) 4 SCC 138]; and National Institute of Technology & Ors. v. Niraj Kumar Singh [2007 (2) SCALE 525]
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 727 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1