Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.26 seconds)
Afreen Fatima vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. ... on 15 June, 2021 cites

Rajendra Pratap Singh Yadav & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 5 July, 2011

Mr. Sudeep Seth, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of intervenor has relied on paragraph nos.1,5,7 and 9 in 2008 SCC Online, Allahabad 511; Rajendra Singh vs. State of U.P. & Ors. he has again relied on paragraph no.3, 10 and 11 in 2019 SCC Online Allahabad 4166; Akhlaq vs. State of U.P. & Ors. he has also relied onparagraph no.41 in (2012) 8 SCC 384; Vidur Impex & Traders Private Limited and Others vs Tosh Apartments Private Limited & Ors, with the submission that the complainant has a right to be heard in such matters and therefore the intervention application has been filed. He has further submitted that the appointment of petitioner was void owing to the fact that the same is against the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 since the petitioner could not have been appointed when her father was a Member of Managing Committee. However, the aspect of decision on intervention application is being left open at this stage.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 488 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Akhlaq vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 5 February, 2019

Mr. Sudeep Seth, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of intervenor has relied on paragraph nos.1,5,7 and 9 in 2008 SCC Online, Allahabad 511; Rajendra Singh vs. State of U.P. & Ors. he has again relied on paragraph no.3, 10 and 11 in 2019 SCC Online Allahabad 4166; Akhlaq vs. State of U.P. & Ors. he has also relied onparagraph no.41 in (2012) 8 SCC 384; Vidur Impex & Traders Private Limited and Others vs Tosh Apartments Private Limited & Ors, with the submission that the complainant has a right to be heard in such matters and therefore the intervention application has been filed. He has further submitted that the appointment of petitioner was void owing to the fact that the same is against the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 since the petitioner could not have been appointed when her father was a Member of Managing Committee. However, the aspect of decision on intervention application is being left open at this stage.
Allahabad High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 6 - S Varma - Full Document

Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt.Ltd.& Ors vs Tosh Apartments Pvt.Ltd.& Ors on 21 August, 2012

Mr. Sudeep Seth, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of intervenor has relied on paragraph nos.1,5,7 and 9 in 2008 SCC Online, Allahabad 511; Rajendra Singh vs. State of U.P. & Ors. he has again relied on paragraph no.3, 10 and 11 in 2019 SCC Online Allahabad 4166; Akhlaq vs. State of U.P. & Ors. he has also relied onparagraph no.41 in (2012) 8 SCC 384; Vidur Impex & Traders Private Limited and Others vs Tosh Apartments Private Limited & Ors, with the submission that the complainant has a right to be heard in such matters and therefore the intervention application has been filed. He has further submitted that the appointment of petitioner was void owing to the fact that the same is against the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 since the petitioner could not have been appointed when her father was a Member of Managing Committee. However, the aspect of decision on intervention application is being left open at this stage.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 229 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1