Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Indore Development Authority vs Smt. Sadhana Agarwal & Ors on 7 March, 1995 cites

Bareilly Development Authority & Anr vs Ajai Pal Singh & Ors on 17 February, 1989

9. This Court in the case of Bareilly Development Authority v. Ajai Pal Singh, (1989) 2 SCC 116, had to deal with a similar situation in connection with the Bareilly Development Authority which had undertaken construction of dwelling units for people belonging to different income groups styled as 'Lower Income Group','Middle Income Group','Higher Income Group' and the 'Economically' Weaker Sections. The respondents to the said appeal had registered themselves for allotment of the flats in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in the brochure issued by the Authority. Subsequently, the respondents of that appeal, received notices from the Authority intimating the revised cost of the houses/flats and the monthly instalment rates which were almost double of the cost and rate of instalments initially stated in the General Information Table. But taking all facts and circumstances into consideration, this
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 414 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Delhi Development Authority vs Pushpendra Kumar Jain on 23 September, 1994

-Court said that it cannot be held that there was a misstatement or incorrect statement or any fraudulent concealment, in the brochure published by the. Authority. It was also said that the respondents cannot be heard to say that the authority had arbitrarily and unreasonably changed the terms and conditions of the brochure to the prejudice of the respondents. In that connection, it was pointed out that the most of the respondents had accepted the changed 6 and varied terms. Thereafter they were not justified in seeking any direction from the Court to allot such flats on the original terms and conditions. Recently, the same question has been examined in the case of Delhi Development Authority V. Pushpendra Kumar Jain, JT 1994 (6) SC 292. In respect of hike in the price of the flats, it was said:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 127 - Full Document
1