Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.24 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Prashant Goel vs State & Anr on 13 October, 2009
The
accused thus, could not be deprived of such a valuable
right and it was held that this principle would be
applicable whether the case originates on the lodging of
the FIR as a State case or it is on the basis of the
complaint filed by the complainant.
State Of Maharashtra vs Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre on 7 October, 1994
These observations
were also made in view of the pronouncement of the
Sandeep Sethi
2013.08.30 10:38
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CRM No.M-12021 of 2013 (O&M) -3-
Apex Court in State of Maharashtra V. Sharadchandra
Vinayak Dongre,(1995) 1 SCC 42.
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Riga Sugar Co. Ltd. vs Kessels Engg. Works Pvt. Ltd. on 5 March, 2008
In support of his arguments, learned counsel has
placed reliance on Riga Sugr Co. Ltd. Vs. Kessels Engg. Works
Pvt. Ltd. 2008(4) AD (Delhi) 519 wherein it was held as under:-
Mr. Sanjay Raghuram And Mr. S.R. ... vs Telengana Investments And Finances ... on 24 March, 2006
Learned counsel has further placed reliance on
Sanjay Raghuram and another Vs. Telengana Investments and
Finances Limited 2006(2) DCR 74 : 2006 wherein it was held as
under:-
1