Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.54 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 437 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 212 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 160 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra vs Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao on 29 September, 1989
44. Reliance placed by the learned Special Public Prosecutor on the decision of the Supreme court in the case of Capt. Budhikota Rao (supra) is, with respect, in appropriate in that case, Successive bail applications filed by Subha Rao were dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court by a common order on 6th June, 1989. It seems that the learned Single Judge was unaware of the pendency of yet another bail application filed by Subha Rao. The Supreme court noted That before the ink was dry on the order dated 6th June, 1989, another learned Single Judge of the Bombay
High Court granted a prayer which was similar to the one that was rejected on 6th June, 1989. It was noted that between the two conflicting orders, there was a gap of only two days and that it was nobody's case that during those two days drastic changes had taken place necessitating the release of Subha Rao on bail. In this context, the Supreme Court observed that once an application was rejected there was no question of granting a similar prayer since it amounted to over-ruling the earlier decision without there being a change in the fact situation.