Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (2.85 seconds)
Saurashtra Shramik Sangh Through ... vs Amreli Nagarpalika Through Chief ... on 29 June, 2021 cites

Manager Govt. Branch Press &. Anr vs D. B. Belliawpa on 30 November, 1978

In The Manager Govt. Branch Press and Anr. v. D.B. Belliappa, A.I.R. 1979 S.C. 429, a three judges bench of the Supreme Court held that protection of Articles 14 and 16(1) is available even to a temporary government servant and if the action of the employer is found to be arbitrary or discriminatory, it is liable to be invalidated. While repelling the argument advanced on behalf of the appellant that Articles 14 and 16 do not have any relevance in the matters involving termination of services of temporary employees, their Lordships held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 299 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

Hari Nandan Prasad & Anr vs Employer I/R To Mangmt.Of F.C.I. & Anr on 17 February, 2014

4. The principal argument of Mr. Joshi is that the appellant in the present case was appointed in 1983, whereas almost more than 20 employees appointed almost 10 years thereafter on the same service conditions were absorbed as the permanent employees and are drawing salary of the regular pay scale with all other benefits. It is argued that even after putting in almost 40 years of service without any break, the appellant herein is being paid the minimum wages and is being treated as a daily wager. This, according to Mr. Joshi, is nothing but unfair labour practice. Mr. Joshi would submit that the learned Single Judge committed a serious error in rejecting the writ application by relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 219 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1