Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)Section 384 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 13B in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in the court.
She has been identified by her counsel. The learned counsel for the
complainant on instructions from the complainant/respondent no.2 also
prayed that the impugned FIR be quashed. The learned counsel for the
parties have relied upon B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Harayana, reported in
[(2003) 4 S.C.C. 675] to contend that although offences under Section
120-B and 384 I.P.C. are non-compoundable, but in cases of matrimonial
S.B. CRLMP No. 2879/2016
3
dispute, if the parties arrive at compromise, then FIR in respect of non-
compoundable offences can be quashed, by the High Court by invoking
powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. A further reliance has been placed on
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303.
1