Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in the court. She has been identified by her counsel. The learned counsel for the complainant on instructions from the complainant/respondent no.2 also prayed that the impugned FIR be quashed. The learned counsel for the parties have relied upon B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Harayana, reported in [(2003) 4 S.C.C. 675] to contend that although offences under Section 120-B and 384 I.P.C. are non-compoundable, but in cases of matrimonial S.B. CRLMP No. 2879/2016 3 dispute, if the parties arrive at compromise, then FIR in respect of non- compoundable offences can be quashed, by the High Court by invoking powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. A further reliance has been placed on Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303.
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1