Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.18 seconds)

M/S Jk International vs State, Govt Of Nct Of Delhi And Others on 23 February, 2001

8 The High Court has proceeded to make adverse observations in regard to the conduct of the appellant. Those observations form the basis of the order for transfer of the investigation. Moreover, the appellant has a reasonable and legitimate apprehension that the observations made by the High Court (without hearing her) will impinge upon the proceedings arising out of the FIR. The appellant, who is the original complainant, at whose behest the FIR was registered, was not a party to the proceedings before the High Court and had no opportunity to controvert the submissions which were made against her or to answer the allegations. The High Court has acted in breach of the principles of natural justice and in a manner which is contrary to the settled principles of law, particularly, those enunciated in the decision in J.K. International (supra). We, therefore, order and direct that the observations contained in the first two sentences of paragraph 10 and in paragraph 11 of the judgment of the High Court against the appellant shall stand expunged and shall not be utilized in any other court or proceeding. 9 Insofar as the transfer of the investigation to the DIU is concerned, a copy of the final report under Section 173 has been filed, together with the counter affidavit of the second respondent. The final report, insofar as is material states as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 138 - Full Document
1   2 Next