Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.40 seconds)
All India State Bank Officers' ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 13 September, 1996 cites

State Of U.P. vs Rafiquddin And Ors. on 4 November, 1987

31. Again in the State of U.P. v. Rafiquddin and Ors. [1987 (Supp) SCC 401} dealing with a case relating to U.P. Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951 the prescription of 35 per cent qualifying minimum marks for viva voce test was uphled. In this connection it was observed that if any minimum marks either in the written test or in viva voce test are fixed by the Public Service Commission so as to determine the suitability of a candidate the same has to be respected.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 127 - K N Singh - Full Document

Mehmood Alam Tariq And Ors. Etc vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors. Etc on 11 May, 1988

32. It is not necessary to multiply the number of cases in this regard except to notice the decision of this Court in Mehmood Alam Tariq and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. . This case related to recruitment by the Public Service Commission to certain branches of service under the State by a scheme of competitive examination. The Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court had declared the rules which required that a candidate must secure a minimum of 33 per cent of the marks prescribed for the Viva Voce examination as being unconstitutional. While allowing the appeal arising from the said judgment 'his Court held that considering the nature of the services for which the recruitment vas to be made the provision in the rules requiring the candidate to obtain a minimum of 33 per cent of marks in Viva voce test could not be regarded as bad in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 104 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Yadav And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc on 10 May, 1985

10. Ashok Kumar Yadav's case was concerned with the recruitments made by the Haryana Public Service Commission to 61 posts in Haryana Civil Service (Executive) and other allied services. The relevant rules provided that a competitive examination was to be held consisting of written examination in different papers having an aggregate of 700 marks and a viva voce examination carrying 200 marks. The rules, inter alia, further provided that no candidate was eligible to appear in the viva voce test unless he obtained 45 per cent marks in aggregate in all the subjects. In response to the said advertisement 6000 candidates applied and appeared for the written examination and out of these over 1300 secured 45 per cent marks and had thus qualified for being called for the interview or the viva voce examination. Though originally the recruitment was only for 61 posts but during the time when the selection process was under way a total number of 119 posts became available. The Haryana Public Service Commission invited all the 1300 and odd candidates who had qualified for the viva voce test and the interview lasted for almost half a year. On the basis of the total marks obtained in the written examination as well as viva voce test 119 candidates were selected and recommended by the Commission to the State Government. Some of the candidates who were not selected filed a writ petition in the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the said selection. Five of the selected candidates, including Ashok Kumar, were impleaded as respondents.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 998 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next