Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)

Dhanajaya Reddy vs State Of Karnataka on 14 March, 2001

12] By now, it is settled principle of law that when the law requires a particular thing to be read in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner alone or not at all. We may gainfully refer the judgments of Apex Court in the case of Dhananjaya Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2001) 4 SCC 9 and in the case of Babu Verghese and others Vs. Bar Council of Kerala ::: Downloaded on - 11/06/2015 23:59:08 ::: 17 reported in (1999) 3 SCC 422 in that regard. It can thus be seen that when a particular amendment is to be insisted by the Registrar, he can do only under Section 14 and that too after following the procedure as provided under Section 14 and Rule 13.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 261 - Full Document

Babu Verghese & Ors vs Bar Council Of Kerala & Ors on 16 March, 1999

12] By now, it is settled principle of law that when the law requires a particular thing to be read in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner alone or not at all. We may gainfully refer the judgments of Apex Court in the case of Dhananjaya Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2001) 4 SCC 9 and in the case of Babu Verghese and others Vs. Bar Council of Kerala ::: Downloaded on - 11/06/2015 23:59:08 ::: 17 reported in (1999) 3 SCC 422 in that regard. It can thus be seen that when a particular amendment is to be insisted by the Registrar, he can do only under Section 14 and that too after following the procedure as provided under Section 14 and Rule 13.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 370 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1