Ajay Katiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 May, 2017
11. The said order also refers the order 16/08/2017 passed by the
State Women Commission which given clean chit to the petitioner,
although the said orders are not with the petitioner but reference of
the said order finds place by the committee members in their report
dated 30th January, 2018 therefore, as per the guidelines, in-house
inquiry was also conducted in which petitioner stand exonerated. The
said inquiry also refers the fact of an enquiry conducted by the State
Women Commission therefore, twice inquiries were conducted on
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
6 M.Cr.C. No.38047/2018
(Ajay Katiyar Vs. State of M.P. and Another)
same set of allegations, therefore, it appears that respondent No.2
tried to create a situation for implication of the applicant/ petitioner
on false pretext. Here it appears that false allegations have been
levelled by respondent No.2.