Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.38 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Nelson Fernandes And Ors vs Special Land Acquisition ... on 2 March, 2007
{Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai (Deceased) through his Heirs
and LRs. and Others v. State of Gujarat (1989) 4 SCC 250,
Nelson Fernandes & Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition
Officer, South Goa & Ors. (2007) 9 SCC 447}.
The Land Acquisition Officer Revenue ... vs Smt. L. Kamalamma (Deed) By Trs. & Ors., ... on 19 January, 1998
case of Land Acquisition Officer Revenue
Divisional Officer, Chittor v. L. Kamlamma (Smt.)
Dead by LRs and others K. Krishnamachari and
others, (1998) 2 SCC 385. What was held and is
relevant was as under:-
Panna Lal Ghosh & Ors vs Land Acquisition Collector & Ors on 12 December, 2003
21. The most reliable way to determine the value
is to rely on the instances of sale portions of the same
land as stands acquired or adjacent lands made shortly
before or after the Section 4 Notification. {Panna Lal
Ghosh & Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector & Ors. (2004)
1 SCC 467}
Smt. Shakuntalabai & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 November, 1995
{Shakuntalabai (Smt.) & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
(1996) 2 SCC 152, ONGC Limited v. Sendhabhai Vastram
.
Smt. Triveniben & Ors vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 7 February, 1989
{Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai (Deceased) through his Heirs
and LRs. and Others v. State of Gujarat (1989) 4 SCC 250,
Nelson Fernandes & Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition
Officer, South Goa & Ors. (2007) 9 SCC 447}.
Atma Singh (Died) Through Lrs. & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 7 December, 2007
The existing amenities like, water, electricity, possibility
of their further extension, whether near about Town is
developing or has prospect of development have to be
taken into consideration. (Atma Singh and others v. State
of Haryana and another (2008) 2 SCC 568).
Union Of India vs Pramod Gupta (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 7 September, 2005
In Union of India v. Pramod Gupta (Dead) by
LRs. & Ors . [(2005) 12 SCC 1], the Apex Court held that
the best method, as is well-known, would be the amount
which a willing purchaser would pay to the owner of the
land. In absence of any direct evidence, the court,
however, may take recourse to various other known
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:31:15 :::HCHP
27
methods. Evidence admissible therefor inter alia would
be judgments and awards passed in respect of
acquisitions of lands made in the same village and/or
.
Suresh Kumar vs Town Improvement Trust, Bhopal on 3 March, 1989
In Suresh Kumar v. Town Improvement Trust,
Bhopal [(1989) 2 SCC 329], the Apex Court has held that
while determining the market value of the land acquired,
rt
it has to be correctly determined and paid so that there is
neither unjust enrichment on the part of the acquirer nor
undue deprivation on the part of the owner.