Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.70 seconds)

D. Vinod Shivappa vs Nanda Belliappa on 25 May, 2006

14. It is relevant to note that the Supreme Court, in D. Vinod Shivappa v. Nanda Belliappa, (2006) 6 SCC 456 ruled that where a notice has been properly addressed and sent by registered post and subsequently returned with an endorsement that the addressee was not available, it would be generally presumed (although not in all cases) that notice has been duly served but that it would be open for the addressee to rebut the presumption by adducing proof to that extent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 223 - B P Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next