Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.28 seconds)The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Section 5 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 4A in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
K.Sivaraman vs P.Sathishkumar on 13 February, 2020
In fact, in the case of K. Sivaraman (Supra) it
was held that the 2009 Amendment, which removed the former cap in
Page 20
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKAR
Reason: Authentication
Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT,
CUTTACK
Date: 17-Jan-2026 16:26:20
Explanation II to Section 4, has the effect of ensuring compensation on
actual wages, and not on a deemed minimum. The Court held as under:
Ashok Ram Parhad vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 March, 2023
They also rely upon
the decision of the Supreme Court in Ashok Ram Parhad and
others v. State of Maharashtra and others2, to submit that
government resolutions cannot override statutory rules, and on
that premise contend that the notification dated 03.01.2020 cannot
control or curtail the statutory computation prescribed under the
Act.
Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs Srinivas Sabata And Anr on 4 December, 1975
13. On interest, the Tribunal held that compensation fell due from the date
of the accident and that failure to pay within one month attracted
interest under Section 4A. It noted that the accident occurred on
06.03.2023 but only part payment was deposited on 07.07.2023. Relying
on Kerala State Electricity Board v. Valsala K8 and the Constitution
Bench decision in Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata9, it took
the view that compensation becomes payable from the date personal
injury is caused, not from the date of the Commissioner's order or the
date of claim. On that basis, it directed simple interest at 12% per annum
on the entire compensation amount from 06.03.2023 till 07.07.2023,
quantified at Rs. 1,87,452/-, and further interest at 12% per annum on the
balance amount (Rs. 46,35,523 minus Rs. 15,44,625 = Rs. 30,90,898) from
07.07.2023 till actual payment.
Ved Prakash Garg vs Premi Devi & Ors on 25 September, 1997
It also relied on Ved Prakash Garg v.
Premi Devi10 to state that interest is a part and parcel of compensation.
Issue No. II on liability was then answered by holding the employer
liable under Section 3 to pay the balance compensation along with
interest as directed. Finally, in the operative portion, the Tribunal
allowed the case on contest, confirmed entitlement of the applicants to
Rs. 46,35,523/-, and directed deposit of the balance compensation and
interest within 30 days for onward disbursement.
8
AIR 1999 SC 3502.