Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.41 seconds)Asha And Ors. vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. And Anr. on 3 September, 2003
(xi) In Asha v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , the Supreme Court decided the question as to whether the appeal filed by the Insurance Company and the insured is maintainable or not. The Supreme Court was pleased to consider the arguments adduced by the learned Counsel as to whether the High Court erred in deducting the allowances and the amounts paid towards L.I.C., Security purpose and H.B.A., from the monthly gross income for computing compensation.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
The Insurance Act, 1938
Metropolitan Transport Corporation ... vs Padmini Sivaramakrishnan, N.S. ... on 16 September, 2004
13. Following the principles laid down in the above decisions, the award of Rs.20,000/- towards mental agony is liable to be deducted. The award of Rs.25,000/- towards loss of dependency and Rs.20,000/- towards loss of happiness are also without any basis and therefore they are deducted from the final award.
The Fatal Accidents Act, 1855
S. Narayanamma And Ors. vs Secretary To Govt. Of India, Ministry Of ... on 16 March, 2002
(viii) The Andhra Pradesh High Court in S.Narayanamma and Ors. v. Secretary to Government of India and Ors. [II (2002) ACC 582], following Mrs.Helan C.Rebello's case, held that,
the contributions made by the deceased-employee towards Employees' Provident Fund, Life Insurance (LIC), Group Insurance and the deductions shown in the salary certificate of the deceased-employee towards the vehicle loan instalment, benefit fund, and also the amounts received by the deceased-employee towards interim Relief, Special Pay, Dearness Allowance, House Rent Allowance, need not be deducted from the gross salary of the deceased for ascertaining the income, because the contributions/deductions made towards, E.P.F., L.I.C., Group Insurance and Benefit Fund would be beneficial to the family of the deceased-employee and it would be the estate of the deceased.
Bishansing Thakursing vs Nasira Kadar Shaikh And Ors. on 7 March, 2002
(ix) In Bishansing Thakursing v. Nasira Kadar Shaikh reported in I (2005) ACC 676, the Bombay High Court following the principles laid down in Mrs.Helan C.Rebello's case, held that there cannot be any deductions of amount received towards life insurance, provident fund and ex-gratia payment.
Smt. A. Lakshmi vs Arjun Associated Pvt. Ltd., Rep. By Its ... on 12 April, 2004
(x) In A.Lakshmi v. Arjun Associated Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2005 ACJ 704, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has considered the various decisions on this point as to whether the deductions of professional tax from the gross salary of the deceased is permissible while computing compensation. The Court has extensively considered as to whether the deferred payments receivable under the Provident Fund Act as well as Insurance Scheme being contractual benefit are deductable from the gross salary of the deceased while computing compensation.
Smt Sarla Dixit & Anr vs Balwant Yadav & Ors on 29 February, 1996
11. The accident had occurred on 22.10.2003 and that the income of the deceased, if he was alive on 01.01.2004 is Rs.13,334/- less tax. Following the principles laid down in Sara Dixit's case, I am inclined to determine the income of the deceased at Rs.13,334/- and after deducting statutory payments, the monthly income of the deceased is determined at Rs.12,998/- for computing dependency compensation.