Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (2.40 seconds)

Cit vs Dewan Kraft System (P) Ltd. on 30 July, 2007

"5. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. Hon'ble Delhi High Court, vide its order dated 10.2.2010, has disposed of appeals for assessment years 1992-03 to 1995-96 and 2000-01 in the case of Sona Koyo Sterling Systems Ltd. In that case, the issue relates to computation of deduction admissible under section 80I of the Act. Hon'ble High Court has considered the meaning of gross total income as explained in section 80-B(5) of the Act as well as the conditions enumerated in sub-section (6) of section 80IA of the Act. The Hon'ble Court has also considered its earlier decision in the case of Dewan Kraft Systems (P) Ltd. wherein section 80-IA(5) and (7) were considered. Hon'ble Court has held that sub-section (6) of section 80-I begins with a non-obstante clause, according to this section the quantum of deduction is to be computed as if the industrial undertaking were the only source of income of the assessee during the relevant year s. While explaining the provisions, Hon'ble Court has observed that in other words, each industrial undertaking or unit is to be treated separately and independently. This was observed because deduction under section 80IA would be admissible only in those units and industrial undertaking which have a profit or gain. In sub-section (7) of section 80IC, it has ITA-745/2011 Page 2 been provided that provisions contained in sub-section (5) and subsections (7) to (12) of section 80-IA shall, so far as may be, applied to the eligible undertaking or enterprises under this section, meaning thereby that same provision would be applicable in section 80-IC of the Act. Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Dewan Kraft Systems (P) Ltd. and Sona Koyo (supra) has held that each unit will be considered independently. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that Learned First Appellate Authority has rightly applied the ratio of Hon'ble Delhi High Court and has rightly directed the Assessing Officer not to adjust the losses of Delhi Unit while computing the eligible profit in respect of Baddi Unit for granting deduction under section 80-IC of the Act. No other issue was agitated before us. Hence, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 24 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii vs Sona Koyo Steering Systems Limited on 10 February, 2010

4. This Court is of the opinion that having regard to the express language of Section-80IC (5) as well as Section-80IC (7) which incorporates by reference Section-80IA (5), the approach adopted by the Tribunal cannot be faulted. The Court also noticed that the same reasoning has been indicated in another Division Bench ruling in CIT v. Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd., (2010) 321 ITR 463.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 5 - B D Ahmed - Full Document
1