Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)Section 3 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
Section 2 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. Ltd vs Geoffrey Manners & Co. Pvt. Ltd on 8 September, 1969
(51) Mr. Aggarwal also asserts that the beginning of the words, which are alleged to cause confusion are important, and that the words have to be viewed as a whole and not merely some of its alphabets. Only the alphabets which go to make up the words are not to be taken into account .in isolation and he refers J970 Supreme Court 2062: (17) F. Heffimann-La Reche and Co. Ltd. V. Geoffrey Manners and Co. Private Ltd. That case clearly holds that it is the entire word which has' to be seen; that ail the alphabets have to be pronounced when phonetics are to be taken into account, and no alphabets used in a word can be slurred over.
Section 3 in The English And Foreign Languages University Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 40 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
1