Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sh. Yashpal Chaudhrani & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr. on 22 April, 2019
7. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are
required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent
abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash
non- compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence
and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme
Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of
matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have
reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S.
Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v.
D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs.
State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
Kapil Gupta vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 10 August, 2022
8. Moreover, the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 had solemnized
marriage and it is in interest of the society to settle and re-settle the
family for their welfare. Therefore the Court in Kapil Gupta v. State
(NCT of Delhi) 2022 SCC Online SC 1030 observed that the
matrimonial dispute should be quashed in light of the new beginning
for the distressed family.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003
7. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are
required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent
abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash
non- compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence
and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme
Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of
matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have
reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S.
Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v.
D.A.Deepa, (2013) 5SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs.
State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.