Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Section 8 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Ramchandra Sakharam Mahajan vs Damodar Trimbak Tanksale (D) & Ors on 9 July, 2007
18. Further in Ramchandra Sakharam Mahajan v. Damodar Trimbak Tanksale,
M. No. 15/16 Smt. Sarabjit Kaur Vs. Harsharan Singh
10
(2007) 6 SCC 737 it is observed by Hon'ble Apex court has observed that:
Prakash vs Phulavati . on 16 October, 2015
Counsel
for the defendants place heavy reliance upon judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court
in Prakash & Ors Vs. Phulavati & Ors, 2015 (11) SCALE, 643. Relevant
paragraph of the said judgment is being reproduced as under:-
Rangammal vs Kuppuswami & Anr on 13 May, 2011
17. It is pertinent to state in here that it is stated by the plaintiffs in their plaint that
Sh. Uttam Singh has left behind the property bearing no. A-4, Shyam Nagar, Khayala
Road, New Delhi. Although, the said fact is not denied by the defendants in their
written statement, however the burden lies upon the plaintiffs to prove that Sh. Uttam
Singh was owner of the abovesaid property, as ownership over a property cannot be
said to be proved merely on the basis of admission of other parties. I may gainfully
referred the observations made by Hon'ble Apex Court in in Rangammal v.
Kuppuswami, (2011) 12 SCC 220
"101.Burden of proof.--Whoever desires any court to give judgment
as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts
which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist.
1