Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
The Dentists Act, 1948
Section 10D in The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 10C in The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 10D in The Dentists Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Islamic Academy Of Education And ... vs State Of Karnataka And Others on 14 August, 2003
After having held so, I must, however, note that the
Course, which is being offered by the Colleges, i.e. Bachelor of
Unani Medicine and Surgery Course, is undoubtedly a
professional course. The institutions, therefore, cannot be
allowed to admit students through a process, which is not fair
and transparent and which does not promote merit and
excellence to such courses. To curb malpractices, the Supreme
Patna High Court CWJC No.16541 of 2018(5) dt.10-10-2018
16/17
Court, in case of Modern Dental College and Research Centre
and Others vs. State of M.P., reported in (2016) 7 SCC 353,
taking note of earlier decisions in case of T.M.A. Pai
Foundation v. State of Karnataka, reported in (2002) 8 SCC
481, Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka,
reported in (2003) 6 SCC 697, and P.A. Inamdar v. State of
Maharashtra, reported in (2005) 6 SCC 537, has emphasized
the need of common entrance test to be held for admission to
professional courses. The common entrance test can be held
either by the Central Government or the State Government or
any other Agency/Association of Institutions, duly approved by
the Central Government/State Government.
Sankalp Charitable Trust And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors on 28 April, 2016
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General
for the Union of India has contended that it is only for the
purpose that meritorious candidates are allowed admission to
AYUSH Courses, the Central Government taking cue from the
Supreme Court's decision, in case of Mihir Abhijat Pathak &
Ors. Vs. Medical Council of India & Anr., which is reported
with Sankalp Charitable Trust v. Union of India, (2016) 7
SCC 487 (at Page 496),, that there should be a common
entrance test for admission to medical courses, a decision was
taken making NEET to be an essential qualification for
admission to these courses. He contends that even in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.16541 of 2018(5) dt.10-10-2018
6/17
absence of any amendment in the Regulation, in larger public
interest, the Central Government has taken this decision by
issuing guidelines allowing admission to AYUSH (UG) Courses
only through NEET.
T.M.A.Pai Foundation & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 31 October, 2002
After having held so, I must, however, note that the
Course, which is being offered by the Colleges, i.e. Bachelor of
Unani Medicine and Surgery Course, is undoubtedly a
professional course. The institutions, therefore, cannot be
allowed to admit students through a process, which is not fair
and transparent and which does not promote merit and
excellence to such courses. To curb malpractices, the Supreme
Patna High Court CWJC No.16541 of 2018(5) dt.10-10-2018
16/17
Court, in case of Modern Dental College and Research Centre
and Others vs. State of M.P., reported in (2016) 7 SCC 353,
taking note of earlier decisions in case of T.M.A. Pai
Foundation v. State of Karnataka, reported in (2002) 8 SCC
481, Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka,
reported in (2003) 6 SCC 697, and P.A. Inamdar v. State of
Maharashtra, reported in (2005) 6 SCC 537, has emphasized
the need of common entrance test to be held for admission to
professional courses. The common entrance test can be held
either by the Central Government or the State Government or
any other Agency/Association of Institutions, duly approved by
the Central Government/State Government.
Modern Dental College And Research ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 June, 2017
After having held so, I must, however, note that the
Course, which is being offered by the Colleges, i.e. Bachelor of
Unani Medicine and Surgery Course, is undoubtedly a
professional course. The institutions, therefore, cannot be
allowed to admit students through a process, which is not fair
and transparent and which does not promote merit and
excellence to such courses. To curb malpractices, the Supreme
Patna High Court CWJC No.16541 of 2018(5) dt.10-10-2018
16/17
Court, in case of Modern Dental College and Research Centre
and Others vs. State of M.P., reported in (2016) 7 SCC 353,
taking note of earlier decisions in case of T.M.A. Pai
Foundation v. State of Karnataka, reported in (2002) 8 SCC
481, Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka,
reported in (2003) 6 SCC 697, and P.A. Inamdar v. State of
Maharashtra, reported in (2005) 6 SCC 537, has emphasized
the need of common entrance test to be held for admission to
professional courses. The common entrance test can be held
either by the Central Government or the State Government or
any other Agency/Association of Institutions, duly approved by
the Central Government/State Government.