Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.74 seconds)
S.Gopal Reddy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 July, 1996 cites

Ishwari Prasad Mishra vs Mohammad Isa on 27 August, 1962

This Court again pointed out in Ishwari Prasad Vs. Md. Isa, AIR 1963 SC 1728 that expert evidence of handwriting can never be conclusive because it is, after all, opinion evidence, and this view was reiterated in Shashi Kumar Vs. Subodh Kumar, AIR 1964 SC 529 where it was pointed out by this Court that expert's evidence as to handwriting being opinion evidence can rarely, if ever, take the place of substantive evidence and before acting on such evidence, it would be desirable to consider whether it is corroborated either by clear direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 177 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Shashi Kumar Banerjee & Ors vs Subodh Kumar Banerjee Since Deceased & ... on 13 September, 1963

This Court again pointed out in Ishwari Prasad Vs. Md. Isa, AIR 1963 SC 1728 that expert evidence of handwriting can never be conclusive because it is, after all, opinion evidence, and this view was reiterated in Shashi Kumar Vs. Subodh Kumar, AIR 1964 SC 529 where it was pointed out by this Court that expert's evidence as to handwriting being opinion evidence can rarely, if ever, take the place of substantive evidence and before acting on such evidence, it would be desirable to consider whether it is corroborated either by clear direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 650 - Full Document
1   2 Next