cites: 122169273

Md.Ibrahim & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 September, 2009

In this connection, it is necessary to see the judgment of our Hon'ble Apex Court in Mohammed Ibrahim and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Another, reported in 2009 (8) SCC 751, wherein it was held as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 1195 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel vs The State Of Gujarat on 10 February, 2020

21. Further in the judgment in Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and another, reported in 2020 (3) SCC 794, our Hon'ble Apex Court has held as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 207 - R Banumathi - Full Document

Sonu Gupta vs Deepak Gupta & Ors on 11 February, 2015

22. Herein also, when the issue in respect to the extent of property pertaining to SF No.350/1 in TS No.40/1 and 40/2, is the subject matter in OS No.1646 of 2012, it is not necessary to continue the investigation in the present FIR. Though the counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent / de facto complainant relied on the judgments of our Hon'ble Apex Court in Sonu 16/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.5235 of 2019 and 6504 of 2019 Gupta Vs. Deepak Gupta and others, reported in 2015 (3) SCC 424, and in Sau.Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar Vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No. 255 of 2019 dated 12.02.2019, herein it is a case, the issue pertaining to the criminal complaint is only the subject matter of the civil suit, which is already under consideration before the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore.

Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 320 - S K Singh - Full Document

Sau. Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 February, 2019

22. Herein also, when the issue in respect to the extent of property pertaining to SF No.350/1 in TS No.40/1 and 40/2, is the subject matter in OS No.1646 of 2012, it is not necessary to continue the investigation in the present FIR. Though the counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent / de facto complainant relied on the judgments of our Hon'ble Apex Court in Sonu 16/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.5235 of 2019 and 6504 of 2019 Gupta Vs. Deepak Gupta and others, reported in 2015 (3) SCC 424, and in Sau.Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar Vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No. 255 of 2019 dated 12.02.2019, herein it is a case, the issue pertaining to the criminal complaint is only the subject matter of the civil suit, which is already under consideration before the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore.

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 1870 - L N Rao - Full Document