Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.40 seconds)
Mohamed Mustafa vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 30 August, 2023 cites

Sanjita Roy vs The State Of Assam And 4Ors on 4 December, 2018

17) Being aggrieved, the petitioners and others preferred their individual writ petitions being WP(C) No. 7668/2018 (Md. Yasin Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors), WP(C) No. 7664/2018 (Sanjiv Kumar Roy Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors), WP(C) No. 7665/2018 (Kasaim Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors.), WP(C) No. 7669/2018 (M/S. Oasis Enterprise a Proprietorship Firm Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors ), WP(C) No. 7675/2018 (Kishor Singh Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors.), WP(C) No. 7676/2018 (Mohamed Mustafa Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors .)
Gauhati High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 204 - S K Medhi - Full Document

M/S. Parbati Enterprises A ... vs The State Of Assam Rep. By The Secretary ... on 25 February, 2019

20) As the respondents in the Environment and Forest Department of the State did not comply with the said common judgment and order dated 04.06.2019 within the time so specified, the petitioner of WP(C) No. 7669/2018 ( M/S. Oasis Enterprise a Proprietorship Firm Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors) filed a contempt case being Cont. Cas(C) No. 387/2019 against the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife), Assam, wherein notice was issued on 22.07.2019.
Gauhati High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A K Goswami - Full Document

Arif Md Yeasin Jwadder vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 27 January, 2023

17) Being aggrieved, the petitioners and others preferred their individual writ petitions being WP(C) No. 7668/2018 (Md. Yasin Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors), WP(C) No. 7664/2018 (Sanjiv Kumar Roy Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors), WP(C) No. 7665/2018 (Kasaim Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors.), WP(C) No. 7669/2018 (M/S. Oasis Enterprise a Proprietorship Firm Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors ), WP(C) No. 7675/2018 (Kishor Singh Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors.), WP(C) No. 7676/2018 (Mohamed Mustafa Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors .)
Gauhati High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - S Shyam - Full Document

Md. Mustafa Ali And 18 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 8 January, 2020

17) Being aggrieved, the petitioners and others preferred their individual writ petitions being WP(C) No. 7668/2018 (Md. Yasin Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors), WP(C) No. 7664/2018 (Sanjiv Kumar Roy Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors), WP(C) No. 7665/2018 (Kasaim Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors.), WP(C) No. 7669/2018 (M/S. Oasis Enterprise a Proprietorship Firm Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors ), WP(C) No. 7675/2018 (Kishor Singh Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors.), WP(C) No. 7676/2018 (Mohamed Mustafa Vs. The State of Assam & 2 Ors .)
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - M Choudhury - Full Document

Brij Kishor Singh vs The State Of Assam on 4 September, 2021

"3. ... It is true as observed by this Court in Shivdeo Singh (supra) there is nothing in Article 226 of the Constitution to preclude a High Court from exercising the power of review which inheres in every court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. But, there are Page No.# 23/26 definitive limits to the exercise of the power of review. The power of review may be exercised on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made; it may be exercised where some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is found; it may also be exercised on any analogous ground. But, it may not be exercised on the ground that the decision was erroneous on merits. That would be the province of a court of appeal. A power of review is not to be confused with appellate powers which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court."
Gauhati High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - M Choudhury - Full Document
1   2 Next