Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.35 seconds)The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
Section 6 in The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Parmanand Patel (D) Th. Lrs. & Anr vs Sudha A.Chowgule & Ors on 6 March, 2009
legally admissible evidence on record to prove the inventory
prepared by CBI in respect of items found in the house of
accused/Tribhuwan Singh at the time of search.
4.9.3 The search list prepared by CBI in respect of search
conducted at the official residence of accused/Tribhuwan Singh
on 10.07.03 is Ex.PW8/A (D4) and the inventory of articles found
in his house is Ex.PW8/B (D5). Ld.defence counsel has relied
upon the judgment of N Ramakrishnaiah (dead) through LRs
Vs. State of A P, 2009 CRI.LJ 1767 to challenge the admissibility
of the inventory.
Raj Mohammad And Anr. And Gulzar Ali vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 16 March, 1994
In this respect, I am also guided by judgment of
Hon'ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in Gulzar Ali Vs. State of
Himachal Pradesh, 1995, CRI, LJ, 810 (DB) (para 17 of the
judgment) to place reliance on opinion of a Government expert
more than private expert's opinion. Thus, I hold that the
prosecution has successfully established that the cost of
construction of house of accused at A45, Sector51, NOIDA was
Rs.31,17,800/.