Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 93 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 141 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 142 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
N.K. Wahi vs Shekhar Singh And Ors on 9 March, 2007
It
was also held in paragraph 9 of Kirshna Texport & Capital Markets Ltd.'s
case (Supra) that the Apex Court in N.K.Wahi's case (Supra) has not
considered this issue at all, etc.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Target Overseas Exports (P) Ltd. vs Iqbal on 14 February, 2005
9. A similar view has also been earlier taken by this Court in
the judgments in Target Overseas Exports (P) Ltd. V. Iqbal reported
in 2005 KHC 530 and Susan Zachariah and others v. M/s.Muthoot
Capital Services Ltd. and another reported in 2012 (3) KHC 870, etc.
that once under Section 138 proviso (b) statutory notice has been
issued to the drawer Company, there is no necessity to issue separate
notices to the individual directors who was sought to be vicariously liable
for the action of the Company in question, etc.
Mr. B. Raman, Mr. B. Ramesh And Mr. B. ... vs Shasun Chemicals And Drugs Ltd., Rep. By ... on 29 August, 2006
Madras High Court in the
case Raman v. Shashun Chemicals reported in 2006 Crl.L.J. 4552
had taken a contra position and the said view of the judgment of the
Madras High Court has also been referred to in paragraph 4 of the
Crl.M.C.No.3955/2013 :8:
judgment of the Apex Court in Kirshna Texport & Capital Markets Ltd.
v. Ila A.Agrawal and others (Supra) and the said view of the Madras
High Court has not been accepted by the Supreme Court, etc.
Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1