Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.87 seconds)

Suo-Moto Case No. 01/2010 (In Re: Sugar ... vs 2.2.1 National Federation Of ... on 30 November, 2011

9. This Court has heard the submissions of the parties. Firstly, the scope of challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is a limited one. The interpretation of the terms of the Contract have to be done by the Arbitrator and unless the findings of the Arbitrator are perverse, the Court cannot substitute its opinion, which is the settled position, as per the judgment of the Supreme Court in Associate Builders v. DDA A.I.R. 2015 SC 620
Competition Commission of India Cites 25 - Cited by 400 - Full Document
1