Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)
Unknown vs 18-09-2015 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs K. G. Radhakrishana Panickar & Ors on 28 April, 1998

31. Heavy reliance is placed by the learned standing counsel for the Indian Railways on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others vs. K.G.Radhakrishana Panichar and others . The Supreme Court held that prior to 01.01.1981, casual service was not recognised for any service benefits and therefore the same would not count for determination of retirement benefits. The said decision only deals with entitlement of casual labour prior to 01.01.1981, when scheme was introduced. After notification of the 1993 Rules, the said rules apply to all persons in service as on the date of coming into force of the 1993 Rules and occupy the field.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 67 - Full Document

Ram Kumar And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 21 February, 1991

32. Before the notification of the 1993 Rules, the entitlement to retirement benefits of various categories of Railway employees came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in Ram Kumar and others vs. Union of India and others . By interpreting the provisions contained in paragraph 2511 of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual, the Supreme Court agreed with the submissions made by the learned Additional Solicitor General that retirement benefits and pension were not admissible to a temporary Railway servant and casual labour acquiring temporary status. Civil Miscellaneous Petitions were filed seeking clarification of the earlier decision in Ram Kumar. It was brought to the notice of the Supreme Court that on the basis of the Fourth Pay Commission report, the Board had taken a decision to provide pension at the time of superannuation even to those who were temporary employees. Having regard to the same, Supreme Court directed the Railway Board to consider the claim of temporary employees for pension at the time of superannuation or otherwise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 65 - N M Kasliwal - Full Document

Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava (Dead) By Lrs vs Union Of India on 11 December, 1987

The Court also noted in para-5 of the order dated 06.09.1990 in the case of Ram Kumar v. Union of India that appropriate material was not placed before the Court when the Court accepted the stand of learned Additional Solicitor General. It is thus clear that even prior to notification of the 1993 Rules temporary servants granted retirement benefits. As analyzed in detail in earlier paras, the 1993 Rules comprehensively provided various benefits to various categories of persons associated with Railway service.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 138 - Full Document
1