Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.50 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
P.K. Ramachandran vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 19 September, 1997
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/1908/2019 ORDER DATED: 02/02/2023
undefined
(5) P.K.Ramchandran versus State of Kerala
reported in (1997) 7 SCC 556.
Perumon Bhagvathy Devaswom Perinadu ... vs Bhargavi Amma (D) Thr. Lrs on 11 July, 2008
9.In case of Perumon Bhagvathy Devaswom,
Perinadu Village v. Bhargavi Amma (Dead) by
Lrs. and others reported in (2008) 8 Supreme
Court Cases 321, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
after considering various judgments, dealt in
detail about what should be the approach of
the Courts while condoning the delay as under:
Shakuntala Devi Jain vs Kuntal Kumari And Ors. on 5 September, 1968
In Shakuntala Devi Jain v.
Kuntal Kumari [AIR 1969 SC 575],
this Court reiterated the following
classic statement from Krishna vs.
Chathappan [1890 ILR 13 Mad 269] :
Balwant Singh (Dead) vs Jagdish Singh & Ors on 8 July, 2010
(2) Balwant Singh (Dead) versus Jagdish Singh
and Others reported in 2010 (8) SCC 685.
Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Nath Sahu And Others vs Gobardhan Sao And Others on 27 February, 2002
In Ram Nath Sao vs. Gobardhan
Sao [2002 (3) SCC 195] this Court
observed thus :
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs S.S. Akolkar on 25 January, 1996
In State of Madhya Pradesh vs.
S. S. Akolkar - 1996 (2) SCC 568,
this Court held :
Union Of India vs Ram Charan & Others on 30 April, 1963
9. This Court also made some
observations in Ram Charan (Supra)
about the need to explain, in
addition to alleging that the
plaintiff/appellant not being aware
about the death, the reasons for not
knowing about the death within a
reasonable time. Those observations
have stood diluted in view of
subsequent insertion of sub-rule (5)
in Rule 4 and addition of Rule 10A
in Order 22 CPC by Amendment Act 104
of 1976, requiring (i) the court to
take note of the ignorance of death
as sufficient cause for condonation
of delay, (ii) the counsel for the
deceased party to inform the court
about the death of his client.
Ramlal, Motilal And Chhotelal vs Rewa Coalfields Ltd on 4 May, 1961
(3)Ramlal versus Rewa Coalfields Ltd. reported
in AIR 1962 SC 361.
1