Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.94 seconds)Section 32 in The Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Ajit Kumar Nag vs General Manager (Pj), Indian Oil ... on 6 February, 2004
Drawing support from the observations made
by this Court in The Regional Manager & Anr. Vs.
Pawan Kumar Dubey , and Ajit Kumar Nag Vs.
General Manager (PJ), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
Haldia & Ors. to the effect that the allegation of malice
of fact demands proof of a high degree of credibility,
learned counsel contends that in the absence of any
cogent material, the High Court committed a manifest
error of law in returning a finding of malafide against the
police officials on the basis of a bare bald allegation of
malafides.
State Of U.P. And Anr vs Johri Mal on 21 April, 2004
In State of U.P. & Anr. Vs. Johri Mal , this Court
has observed thus:
Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
In Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India , this
Court has observed that the judicial restraint has two
contemporary manifestations, namely, one the ambit of
judicial intervention and the other, the scope of the
Court's ability to quash an administrative decision on its
merits. Judicial review is not concerned with reviewing
the merits of the decision in support of which the
application for judicial review is made, but the decision-
making process itself.