Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.81 seconds)

Ramesh Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 October, 2001

19. As observed in Ramesh Kumar [Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2001) 9 SCC 618 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 1088] , where the accused by his acts or by a continued course of conduct creates such circumstances that the deceased was left with no other option except to commit suicide, an "instigation" may be inferred. In other words, in order to prove that the accused abetted commission of suicide by a person, it has to be established that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 847 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Randhir Singh & Ors.Etc. vs Randhir Singh .Etc. on 27 April, 2015

38. Analysing further, in Randhir Singh v. State of Punjab [Randhir Singh v. State of Punjab, (2004) 13 SCC 129 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 56] , the Court has observed thus: (SCC p. 134, para 12) "12. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding that person in doing of a thing. In cases of conspiracy also it would involve that mental process of entering into conspiracy for the doing of that thing. More active role which can be described as instigating or aiding the doing of a thing is required before a person can be said to be abetting the commission of offence under Section 306 IPC."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1   2 Next