Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)Section 23 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Menakuru Dasaratharami Reddi vs Duddukuru Subba Rao on 10 May, 1957
In Menakuru Dasaratharami Reddi and
another Vs. Duddukuru Subba Rao and others (supra) Hon'ble Supreme
Court has been pleased to lay down that whether or not dedication is
RSA No.362 of 1980 14
complete would naturally be a question of fact to be determined in each
case in the light of material terms used in the document. In such cases it is
always the matter of ascertaining the true intention of the parties. It is
obvious that such intention must be gathered by fair and reasonable
construction of document considered as a whole. This authority also does
not, in any way, advance the case of the appellants. The law laid down
would lead to a conclusion that the findings of fact recorded by the learned
lower appellate court holding that dedication was partial is a finding of fact
which would not be open to challenge in regular second appeal.
S. Shanmugam Pillai And Ors vs K. Shanmugam Pillai And Ors on 4 May, 1972
In support of this contention learned counsel for the appellants
placed reliance o the judgment in the case of S.Shanmugam Pillai &
others Vs. K.Shanmugam Pillai & others AIR 1972 SC 2069, wherein
Hon'ble Supreme Court has been pleased to lay down as under:-
Balkrishna Savalram Pujari And Others vs Shree Dnyaneshwar Maharajsansthan & ... on 26 March, 1959
In support of this contention learned counsel for the appellant
placed reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Balakrishna Savalram Pujari Waghmare and others Vs. Shree
Dhyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan and others AIR 1959 SC 798, wherein
Hon'ble Supreme Court has been pleased to lay down as under:-
1