Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)Lalit Kumar Jain & Anr vs Jaipur Traders Corporation Pvt. Ltd on 24 April, 2002
4. To substantiate his plea, learned counsel for the petitioner would cite the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 2002 (3) C.T.C. 111 (Lalit Kumar Jain vs. Jaipur Traders Corporation Pvt. Ltd.) and also the decisions of this Court reported in 1988 (II) M.L.J. 95 (Narasimhan vs. Balammal) and 1988 (1) L.W. 34 (Arthanari Mudaliar, S.P. vs. A.Ponnusami).
Narasimhan vs Balammal on 12 September, 1988
4. To substantiate his plea, learned counsel for the petitioner would cite the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 2002 (3) C.T.C. 111 (Lalit Kumar Jain vs. Jaipur Traders Corporation Pvt. Ltd.) and also the decisions of this Court reported in 1988 (II) M.L.J. 95 (Narasimhan vs. Balammal) and 1988 (1) L.W. 34 (Arthanari Mudaliar, S.P. vs. A.Ponnusami).
The Kerala State Electricity Board, ... vs T.P. Kunhaliumma on 29 October, 1976
9. Learned counsel for the respondent-caveator would cite 1996 (3) A.L.T. 818 (B.Sambasiva Reddy vs. Kayagurla Kondanna), wherein the Andhra Pradesh High Court dealt with similar position on the strength of the decision of the Supreme Court (Kerala State Electricity Board vs. T.P.Kunhaliumma).
The Limitation Act, 1963
B. Sambasiva Reddy vs Kayagurla Kondanna on 8 August, 1996
9. Learned counsel for the respondent-caveator would cite 1996 (3) A.L.T. 818 (B.Sambasiva Reddy vs. Kayagurla Kondanna), wherein the Andhra Pradesh High Court dealt with similar position on the strength of the decision of the Supreme Court (Kerala State Electricity Board vs. T.P.Kunhaliumma).
1