Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.01 seconds)
Karnataka State Pollution Control ... vs The General Secretary on 11 April, 2019 cites

Bangalore Water-Supply & Sewerage ... vs R. Rajappa & Others on 21 February, 1978

14. The contention that the issue raised with regard to 'industry' as held in Rajappa's case [supra] has been referred to a larger bench and therefore, to hold that the appellant is an industry is not tenable in the eye of law, cannot be accepted as it is a settled law that mere pendency of a reference to a larger bench does not mean that all other proceedings involving the same issue would remain stayed till a decision was rendered in a reference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 985 - M H Beg - Full Document

Chief Conservator Of Forests And ... vs Jagannath Maruti Kondhare, Etc. Etc. on 6 December, 1995

11. The learned Single Judge has placed reliance on the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Ramachandra and another [(2003) Lab.I.C 8]; wherein it was held that the Forest Department is also an industry within the meaning of 2(j) of the Act, quoting Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Chief Conservator of Forest Vs. Jagannath Maruthi Kondhare [(1996) Lab.I.C 967].
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 289 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

Sri. M.N. Sundar Raj vs Sri. B. Ramachandra Nayak on 13 March, 2015

11. The learned Single Judge has placed reliance on the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Ramachandra and another [(2003) Lab.I.C 8]; wherein it was held that the Forest Department is also an industry within the meaning of 2(j) of the Act, quoting Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Chief Conservator of Forest Vs. Jagannath Maruthi Kondhare [(1996) Lab.I.C 967].
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1