Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.59 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
K. Prakashan vs P.K. Surenderan on 10 October, 2007
22. Learned counsel for the respondent relied on the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K. Prakashan v.
P.K. Surenderan reported in (2008) 1 Supreme Court
Cases 258, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that if
two views are possible, the appellate court should not reverse
the judgment of acquittal merely because other view is
possible. There is no quarrel about the proposition laid down by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has
reiterated the said principles in number of its subsequent
judgments.
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Bir Singh vs Mukesh Kumar on 6 February, 2019
20. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of BIR
SINGH vs. MUKESH KUMAR reported in (2019) 4 SCC 197
regarding presumption of law under Section 139 of the N.I.Act.
relied on paragraph Nos.6, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38 to 40, which
reads as under:
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
18. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on the
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rangappa v. Sri.
Mohan reported in (2010) 11 SCC 441 wherein at para 26,
29 and 30 while distinguishing the observations made by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Krishna Janardhan Bhat v.