Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.02 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Rai Bahadur Ganga Bishnu Swaika & Ors vs Calcutta Pinjrapole Society & Ors on 30 October, 1967
"Coming to the second ground of attack on the declaration contained in Annex. 4, I should think that it is advisable if the declaration states in an express language that the authority making it is satisfied that any
particular land is needed for a public purpose. But even in absence of that, if the language used is with the expression 'it appears' still it has been held by the Supreme Court in Ganga Bishun Swaika v. Calcutta Pinjrapole Society, AIR 1968 SC 615 that it is not imperative that the satisfaction must be expressed in the declaration or that otherwise the notification would not be in accord with Section 6."
State Of Mysore And Ors. vs Hutchappa And Anr. on 25 January, 1977
Obviously, the view would now tend to be contrary to the tenor of the binding precedent in the State of Mysore v. Hutchappa, AIR 1977 SC 2030. With deepest deference to the learned Judges, I find myself wholly unable to subscribe to so over-technical a view and. I am constrained to overrule the relevant observations in the said judgment.