Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Dr Ahmed Ali vs State Of Raj And Ors on 26 September, 2023 cites

Ajit Singh Januja & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 March, 1996

38. A Constitution Bench in case of Ajit Singh vs. State of Punjab: (1997) 7 SCC 209, laying emphasis on Article 14 and Article 16(1) of the Constitution of India held that if a person who satisfies the eligibility and the criteria for promotion but still is not considered for promotion, then there will be clear violation of his/her's fundamental right. Jagannadha Rao,J. speaking for himself and Anand, CJI., Venkataswami, Pattanaik, Kurdukar, JJ., observed the same as follows in paragraphs 21 and 22 and 27:
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 186 - N P Singh - Full Document

Direct Recruit Class Ii Engineering ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 May, 1990

"31. A consistent line of precedent of this Court follows the principle that retrospective seniority cannot be granted to an employee from a date when the employee was not borne on a cadre. Seniority amongst members of the same grade has to be counted from the date of initial entry into the grade. This principle emerges from the decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court in Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers' Association v State of Maharashtra:
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 915 - L M Sharma - Full Document

Director, Lift Irrigation Corporation ... vs Pravat Kiran Mohanty And Ors on 12 February, 1991

[2023:RJ-JP:23419] (7 of 10) [CW-21006/2017] "37. This Court, time and again, has laid emphasis on right to be considered for promotion to be a fundamental right, as was held by K. Ramaswamy, J., in the case of Director, Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. and Others vs. Pravat Kiran Mohanty and Others: (1991) 2 SCC 295 in paragraph 4 of the report which is reproduced below:
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 33 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1