Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010
9. Petitioner has prayed for exempting him from
paying compounding fee on the ground that he is not in a
position to deposit 15% of cheque amount as
compounding fee, because he has arranged the money for
payment to complainant by borrowing the same from his
near relatives and friends. It is submitted by counsel for
the petitioner that considering the ratio of law laid down by
the Apex Court in Damodar S.Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal
H. (2010)5 SCC 663, the Apex Court in Madhya
::: Downloaded on - 04/07/2022 20:01:21 :::CIS
5
Pradesh Legal Services Authority vs. Prateek Jain
and another (2014)10 SCC 690 wherein it has been
.