Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.24 seconds)Sheikhupura Transport Co. Ltd vs Northern India Transport Insurance Co on 16 March, 1971
Clause (b) of section 95(2) of the Act again came up for
consideration before this Court in Manjusri Raha & Ors. etc.
v. B.L. Gupta & Ors. etc. [1977] 2 SCR 944. In that case
also the motor vehicle which was involved in the accident
was a bus carrying passengers on a route in the State of
Madhya Pradesh. The Court followed the decision in the case
of Sheikhupura Transport Co. Ltd. v. Northern India Trans-
port Insurance Co., (supra) and limited the liability of the
insurer to Rs.2,000 as provided by the Act at that time.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
Motor Owners Insurance Co. Ltd vs Jadavji Keshavji Modi & Ors on 29 September, 1981
Immediately after the decision in the Motor Owners
Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jadavji Keshavji Modi & Ors. (supra)
Parliament took steps to amend sub-clause (ii) of clause (b)
of section 95(2) of the Act by Act 47 of 1982. After the
said amendment subclause (ii) of clause (b) of section 95(2)
of the Act reads thus:
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Mahmood Ahmed And Ors. on 25 November, 1983
The decision of the
Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court in New India Assur-
ance Co. Ltd. v. Mahmood Ahmad and others, (supra) is dis-
sented from in the later decision of the Division Bench of
the Allahabad High Court in Raghib Nasim and another v.
Naseem Ahmad and others, (supra).
Raghib Nasim And Anr. vs Naseem Ahmad And Ors. on 17 April, 1985
The decision of the
Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court in New India Assur-
ance Co. Ltd. v. Mahmood Ahmad and others, (supra) is dis-
sented from in the later decision of the Division Bench of
the Allahabad High Court in Raghib Nasim and another v.
Naseem Ahmad and others, (supra).