Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)M/S. Revajeetu Builders & Developers vs M/S. Narayanaswamy & Sons & Ors on 9 October, 2009
3.7 In support of the arguments, reliance was placed upon
the judgments of this Court in Revajeetu Builders and
Developers v. Narayanaswamy and sons and others 2009(10)
SCC 84 and Vidyabai and others v. Padmalatha and another,
2009 (2) SCC 409.
Vidyabai & Ors vs Padmalatha & Anr on 12 December, 2008
3.7 In support of the arguments, reliance was placed upon
the judgments of this Court in Revajeetu Builders and
Developers v. Narayanaswamy and sons and others 2009(10)
SCC 84 and Vidyabai and others v. Padmalatha and another,
2009 (2) SCC 409.
Lakshmi vs Yatheendradas on 6 January, 2020
In view of the above, I am of the opinion that the
judgments referred above will squarely apply in the facts and
circumstances of the present case. In view of the same, this Court
is not inclined to interfere with the well considered order of the trial
Judge impugned herein.
Basavaraj vs Indira on 14 July, 2015
2025:KER:8143
3.5 The application filed by respondents No. 1 and 2 did not
meet the pre-conditions laid down in Order VI Rule 17 CPC for
permitting respondents No. 1 and 2 to amend the pleadings
at the fag end of the trial. No due diligence was pleaded. All
what was stated was that there was oversight on the part of
respondents No. 1 and 2/plaintiffs.
1