Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)
Dinesh Kumar vs Kiran Bala on 31 January, 2020 cites

V. Dhanapal Chettiar vs Yesodai Ammal on 23 August, 1979

13. In the present case as well the premises had been let out for residential purposes and house rent receipts were being issued. That being the case, having concluded in the judgment that deceased Ram Lal had died as a contractual tenant, the tenancy would not be inherited by the legal heirs as limited by Section 2(l)(iii) but would go as per the Succession Law. The conclusions arrived at in the judgment are in accordance with the law as laid down in the case of V. Dhanpal Chettier (supra) and Gian Devi Anand (supra). There has been no error in concluding that a tenant as legal heir of contractual tenancy became a tenant in her own right and thus, was protected under the Delhi Rent Control Act. The contention of the applicant that defendant was covered by Section 2 (l) (iii) and thus, did not inherit the tenancy rights and because a trespasser against whom civil suit was maintainable, was Misc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 361 - N L Untwalia - Full Document
1