Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.30 seconds)The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Prema Veeraraghavan vs State By The Inspector Of Police, K-10 ... on 22 January, 2002
(25) In R.K. Jaiswal (supra), a learned Judge of the
Allahabad High Court has simply observed : "To me,
it does not appear to be so. The order finally disposed
of the application for custody of the truck."
(26) It bears repetition that such an order does not
decide anything finally.
Section 38 in The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Vikram vs Y.Fogullah Shariff on 11 June, 2015
5. Vikram vs Y.Fogullah Shariff, Criminal Revision Case
No. 1408 of 2013 and M.P.No. 1 of 2013, decided on
11.06.2015 (Madras High Court).
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs The Micro And Small Enterprises ... on 18 September, 2017
On a parity of reasoning I am unable to subscribe to
the following observations of a learned Single Judge
of Andhra Pradesh in Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.
(supra): "The order in question substantially affects
the rights of the parties. If so, it cannot be considered
to be an interlocutory order."
Section 29 in The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
V. C. Shukla vs State Through C.B.I on 7 December, 1979
(12) Still later the Supreme Court explained the nature
and scope of an interlocutory order in V.C. Shukla Vs.
State, .
Shamrao Sampatrao Khanderai vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. on 22 February, 1979
In Shamrao Sampatrao Khanderai
(supra), the learned Judges said : "On the face of it,
the purpose of Section 451 is to direct the custody of
the property till the case is decided. Such an order
would obviously be an interlocutory order."