Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)
Sh. Trilok Chand vs M/S Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd on 18 September, 2021 cites

B.B. Verma vs National Projects Construction ... on 1 July, 1996

By relying upon the decisions rendered in D.L.F Universal Ltd. (supra), B. B. Verma vs. National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. 80 (1990) DLT 498, Patel Roadways Ltd. vs. Tropical Agro Systems Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1992 SC 1514, it was held that merely because the respondents have an office in Delhi would not enable the Labour Court of Delhi to exercise jurisdiction in the matter.
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 21 - N G Nandi - Full Document

Eastern Coalfields Ltd. & Ors vs Kalyan Banerjee on 4 March, 2008

"9. The issue in the present case is fully covered by the decision of the Supreme Court reported in Eastern Coalfields Ltd. (supra) wherein the workman was employed with Eastern Coalfields Limited in Mugma area in the district of Dhanbad, Jharkhand. His services were terminated at Mugma however, workman filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court. On a preliminary objection taken the Calcutta High Court held that since the workman was serving at Mugma area under the General Manager of the area which is the State of Jharkhand, the Calcutta High Court had no jurisdiction. The Supreme Court affirming the decision of the Calcutta High Court held that entire cause of action arose in Mugma area within the State of Jharkhand and only because the head office of the company was situated in the State of West Bengal, the same by itself will not confer any jurisdiction upon the Calcutta High Court particularly when the head office had nothing to do with the order of punishment passed against the workman."
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 82 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next