Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 449 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Muhammad Ata And Ors. vs Emperor Through Musammat Nannhon on 5 November, 1921
If it was not, and particularly where the accused is
defended by counsel (Atta Mohammad v. King Emperor) it
may in a given case be proper to conclude that the accused
was satisfied and knew just what he was being tried for
and knew what was being alleged against him and wanted
no further particulars, provided it is always borne in mind
that no serious defect in the mode of conducting a
criminal trial can be justified or cured by the consent of
the advocate of the accused (Abdul Rahman v. King
Emperor).
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Abdul Rahim vs King-Emperor on 26 February, 1946
If it was not, and particularly where the accused is
defended by counsel (Atta Mohammad v. King Emperor) it
may in a given case be proper to conclude that the accused
was satisfied and knew just what he was being tried for
and knew what was being alleged against him and wanted
no further particulars, provided it is always borne in mind
that no serious defect in the mode of conducting a
criminal trial can be justified or cured by the consent of
the advocate of the accused (Abdul Rahman v. King
Emperor).