Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.23 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Sunil Kumar Saxena & Anr. vs M/S Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. on 8 March, 2017
In the corresponding petition titled as Sunil Kumar Chandra vs. M/S
Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd; ARB. P. 1102/2022 filed by the petitioner for the
appointment of arbitrator, this Court has appointed Mrs. Madhurima Mridul,
Advocate as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the
parties.
Indus Mobile Distribution Pvt. Ltd vs Datawind Innovations Pvt. Ltd. And Ors on 19 April, 2017
14. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Indus Mobile Distribution
(P) Ltd. v. Datawind Innovations (P) Ltd.; (2017) 7 SCC 678 observed as
under:
Ramkishore Lal vs Kamal Narain on 22 November, 1962
In the case of Ramkishorelal v. Kamal Narayan; 1963 Supp (2)
SCR 417 : AIR 1963 SC 890, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as
under:
Section 16 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc vs Hscc (India) Limited on 26 November, 2019
8. It has further been submitted that according to arbitration clause 18.2
of the agreement dated 26th August 2013, the respondent has the power to
choose an arbitrator to adjudicate conflicts between the parties, which is per
se invalid and same has been determined by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
vide its judgment titled as Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. HSCC
(India) Ltd; (2020) 20 SCC 760.