Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)

P.K.K. Shamsudeen vs K.A.M. Mappillai Mohindeen & Ors on 24 November, 1988

In P.K.K. Shamsudeen v. K.A.M. Mappillai Mohindeen and Ors., AIR 1989 S.C. 640, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that an order of recount of votes must stand or fall on the nature of the averments made and the evidence adduced before the order of recount is made and not from the results emanating from the recount of votes. The settled position of law is that the justification for an order for examination of ballot papers and recount of votes is not to be derived from hind sight and by the result of the recount of votes. On the contrary, the justification for an order of recount of votes should be provided by the material placed by an election petitioner on the threshold before an order for recount of votes is actually made. The reason for this salutary rule is that the preservation of the secrecy of the ballot is a sacrosanct principal which cannot be lightly or hastily broken unless there is prima facie genuine need for it. The right of a defeated candidate to assail the validity of an election result and seek recounting of votes has to be subject to the basic principle that the secrecy of the ballot is sacrosanct in a democracy and hence unless the affected candidate is able to allege and substantiate in acceptable measure by means of evidence that a prima facie case of a high degree of probability existed for the recount of votes being ordered by the Election Tribunal in the interest of justice, a Tribunal or court should not order the recount of votes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 110 - M M Dutt - Full Document

Satyanarain Dudhani vs Uday Kumar Singh And Ors. on 17 November, 1992

In Satyanarain Dudhani v. Uday Kumar Singh, AIR 1993 S.C. 367, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the secrecy of the ballot papers cannot be permitted to be tinkered lightly. An order of recount cannot be granted as a matter of course. The secrecy of the ballot papers has to be maintained and only when the Court is satisfied on the basis of material facts pleaded in the petition and supported by the contemporaneous evidence that the recount can be ordered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 76 - K Singh - Full Document
1